What union drives actually look like. It's less dramatic and more possible than you think. The practical reality of workplace organizing.

Here's what nobody tells you about workplace organizing: it's boring. Not in a bad way. In the way that anything real and effective is boring: it's mostly just talking to people.
The movies show picket lines, dramatic speeches, confrontations with management. That stuff happens eventually, maybe. But the actual work of organizing is conversations. One at a time. Over weeks and months. About mundane things like scheduling and pay and whether the break room has enough chairs.
And here's the thing: your workplace could probably be organized. Most workplaces could. The barrier isn't legal (though the law is hostile). It isn't structural (though the structure is hostile). It's that most people have never seen it done, so they assume it can't be.
But it can.
Forget everything you think you know. Organizing isn't about fiery speeches or radical politics. It's about trust. It's about relationships. It's about finding out what people actually care about and connecting that to collective action.
It starts with mapping. Who works where? What shifts? What departments? Who talks to whom? Who trusts whom? This sounds clinical, but it's actually just paying attention to the social dynamics that already exist.
Then comes one-on-one conversations. Not group meetings (those come later). Individual conversations where you ask questions and actually listen. What do you like about working here? What frustrates you? Have you ever thought about why things are the way they are?
Most people have never been asked these questions. Not really. Not by someone who actually wants to hear the answer. And when they do get asked, they have a lot to say.
The goal isn't to convince anyone of anything. Not yet. The goal is to understand what issues people care about and to start building relationships with coworkers who might be interested in doing something about those issues.
At some point, after enough conversations and after enough trust gets built, you form an organizing committee. This is a small group of workers who are committed to the effort and represent different parts of the workplace.
This committee becomes the core. They have more conversations. They map more relationships. They identify leaders, not self-appointed leaders, but people others naturally look to and trust.
The process is iterative. You talk to people, learn what matters to them, figure out who else you should be talking to. You hit walls. You find unexpected allies. You discover that the person you assumed would be against this is actually furious about the same things you are.
And you discover that some people, sometimes people you thought were friends, will oppose it. That's hard. But it's also data. You need to know where the resistance is.
Here's where most people get impatient. The process takes months. Sometimes years. There's no shortcut.
You need a supermajority. Not 50% plus one; you need 70%, 80%, sometimes more. Because when management finds out (and they will find out), they will launch a counter-campaign. They will hold mandatory meetings. They will promise improvements. They will threaten consequences. They will try to peel away anyone on the fence.
If you go public with 55% support, you might end up with 45% after management responds. If you go public with 80% support, you might end up with 70%. The margins matter.
So you keep building. You keep having conversations. You keep tracking where people stand, not in a creepy way, in a "we need to know if we have enough support" way. You address concerns. You answer questions. You wait.
Patience is a strategic asset.
They will find out. Maybe someone talks. Maybe they notice patterns. Maybe they've been through this before and know the signs.
And when they find out, they will respond. Predictably. Management always responds the same way, because there's a whole industry of "union avoidance consultants" who teach them what to do.
First come the mandatory meetings. Captive audience meetings, they're called, because you're required to attend and listen to management explain why a union would be bad. These meetings are legal (inexplicably). The union can't hold equivalent meetings on company time.
Then come the promises. Suddenly, management is very concerned about the break room chairs. Suddenly, there's talk of raises, better scheduling, new policies. Funny how these things only become possible when workers start organizing.
Then come the threats. Not explicit threats; that's illegal (not that it stops everyone). But vague warnings about how unions can be "adversarial," how strikes can cost people money, how the company might have to "make difficult decisions" about staffing levels.
Then come the delays. Legal challenges. Petitions about the bargaining unit. Appeals. Anything to buy time and drain momentum.
None of this is surprising. All of it can be prepared for. The key is making sure workers know it's coming before it happens. When they hear the management talking points, they should already know what the management talking points are. "Oh, this is the part where they say the union just wants our dues." Inoculation turns propaganda into confirmation.
Eventually, if you've done everything right, if you've built enough support, if you've survived the counter-campaign, there's a vote.
The NLRB (or equivalent body, depending on your country) oversees it. Workers vote yes or no on union representation. If a majority votes yes, you have a union.
That's not the end. It's not even close to the end. A union election just means management is legally required to bargain with you. It doesn't mean they'll bargain in good faith (they often won't). It doesn't mean you'll get a contract quickly (you often won't). But it's a start. It's leverage. It's legal recognition that you have the right to act collectively.
And it's terrifying for management. Because now they have to deal with workers as a group instead of one at a time. The power dynamic has shifted.
There's a widespread belief that organizing is something that happens to other people. Factory workers. Teachers. Nurses. Not office workers. Not tech workers. Not retail workers. Not people like you.
This belief is wrong.
Any group of workers can organize. There's no minimum company size. There's no specific industry requirement. If you work somewhere and you have coworkers, you can organize.
The question isn't whether it's possible. The question is whether it's worth it. And that depends on what you want.
If you're frustrated by arbitrary management decisions, organizing gives you a voice in those decisions. If you're worried about pay, organizing gives you collective bargaining power. If you're concerned about job security, organizing gives you protections against arbitrary termination.
These aren't guarantees. A union doesn't automatically fix everything. But it changes the dynamic. It means management can't just do whatever they want anymore. They have to negotiate. They have to justify. They have to deal with workers who have actual power.
The biggest obstacle to organizing isn't management. It isn't the law. It's fear.
Fear of retaliation. Fear of conflict. Fear of failure. Fear of looking foolish. Fear of being the person who "caused problems."
These fears are rational. Retaliation happens (illegally, but it happens). Organizing does create conflict. It can fail. You might end up exposed.
But here's the thing: the fear is part of the system. It's a feature, not a bug. The fact that workers are afraid to organize is precisely what allows management to operate as they do. The fear is doing the work of control.
And the only way to overcome it is to act despite it. Together. That's what solidarity means. Not a slogan. A practice.
Your workplace could be organized. Probably not tomorrow. Probably not by you alone. But it's possible. It's been done in places far less likely than wherever you work.
The process is simple. Talk to your coworkers. Find out what they care about. Build relationships. Slowly, carefully, systematically construct the collective power that already exists but hasn't been mobilized.
It's not dramatic. It's not easy. But it's possible.
And once you know it's possible, the only question is whether you want to do it.
Join my newsletter to get notified when I publish new articles on AI, technology, and philosophy. I share in-depth insights, practical tutorials, and thought-provoking ideas.
Technical tutorials and detailed guides
The latest in AI and tech
Get notified when I publish new articles. Unsubscribe anytime.